Kingston Residents' Alliance
We are active on social media:
  • Home
  • Planning Portal
    • EDEN CAMPUS >
      • EDENCAMPUS PRESENTATION
      • COMMUNITY WORK >
        • LETTERS
      • EDENCAMPUS SLIDESHOW
      • 2020 CONSULTATIONS >
        • KRA RESPONSE 10 January 2021
        • KRA RESPONSE 4th November
      • 2019 - APPLICATION
    • Seething Wells HELP >
      • SW_representation
    • Cambridge Road Estate >
      • CRE - Regeneration
    • SURREY COUNTY HALL >
      • RESIDENTS COMMENTS
      • KRA CONSULTATION RESPONSE
    • Eden Walk >
      • Eden Walk - submission in pictures
      • Eden Walk presentation 18 May
      • Eden Walk presentation 8 March
      • Eden Walk CONCERNS
      • Historic Englands Eden Walk response
      • Design Panel Review
      • Officers report - Eden Walk
    • New Local Plan >
      • Direction of Travel Consultation
      • Opportunity Area
    • Canbury Business Park
    • Old Post Office >
      • KRA response 5
      • TOPO - submission in pictures
      • Presentation notes 4
      • Old Post Office v4 Concerns
      • Historic England response v4
      • Q.C. OPINION
      • Our response to the Officers report >
        • Officers report
      • Zac Goldsmiths Response
      • Presentation notes 3
      • KRA response 3
      • A fresh look
      • Why it is wrong
      • Residents opposition
      • Notable opposition
      • What could be acceptable
      • Why some say yes
      • Who will decide
      • Other planning cases
    • Riverside Boardway
    • Market House >
      • Open Letter
      • April 2016 - Update
    • Fairfield
    • Archive >
      • Archive - Old Post Office #3
      • Archive - Old Post Office #2 >
        • Our response to Officers report >
          • Officers report
        • Historic England rejection
        • Why it is wrong
        • Weight of opposition >
          • Letters to Councillors >
            • Letter to Councillors 1
            • Letter to Councillors 2
            • Letter to Councillors 3
          • Speaker Notes >
            • Key Objections Introduction
            • Affordable Housing
            • Heritage
            • Urban design
            • Aesthetic Design
            • What might be acceptable
  • Historical Context
    • TOPO story
    • Before the final vote
    • KRA Snap Survey Findings
    • Create Streets Guide for Councillors
    • Planning documents >
      • EQDB Deputation by KRA
    • Kingston's Democracy >
      • Neighbourhood Forums
      • GROVEN >
        • Letter to Viv Evans
        • Grove Ward Neighbourhood Invite
      • North Kingston Neighbourhood Forum
      • Meeting Notes
    • RBK Councillors
    • Kingston Futures
  • Press
    • News Blog
    • In the Press
    • Letters
  • About
    • Our advisers
  • Contact
  • COMMS

Letters to other parties


Picture

Comments Deadline
Extension request

1.   Provide hard copies of all Eden Campus planning documents on the portal available for viewing at the library and/or Guildhall. (As British Land did for Eden Walk and St George's for The Old Post Office.) For COVID safety, pre-booking can be used for residents to arrange viewing.

2.  Display their planning application in the town centre somewhere? For example, old-fashioned printed display boards safely placed inside one of the empty shops in or around the affected area is surely doable even under pandemic conditions? 

3. Display a 3D model of their vision of this major town centre reshape.  Models and floor maps could be a similar size to those presented to us by British Land and Berkeley's. 


Applicant's reply
Picture

Service Two

1. Can you take residents’ comments on board and require the Applicant to fully commit to informing residents through a wider range of media than just the RBK website, given this is such a significant proposal for the town. 
2. The Applicant refers to a further consultation with Statutory Consultees. Is there any Resident or Heritage representation in their latest consultee cohort? 
3. Until the website and accessibility issues are resolved, please can the Council extend the comments deadline of 4th November.
4. Referring to the previous point, you may be aware that we were approached by an organisation called The Consultations Institute, specialising in ‘best practice' regarding standards in public consultation. They publicly backed us in our request for a comments deadline extension, citing “the 4 Leggatt/Carrconsiderations” in recent case law for RBK to consider. The link is provided below for your information.: https://www.consultationinstitute.org/what-must-consultation-papers-disclose/


Council's reply
Thank you for your email and apologies for the delay in responding.


I can confirm that the Planning Service has carried out a full consultation process in relation to the planning applications for the Eden Campus redevelopment. Local residents have been written to, 10 site notices have been displayed around the Town Centre, and a notice has been published in the press. With regards to the timeframe for any representations to be received, the statutory time frame is set out in law, however, any representations received up until a decision is taken will be taken into consideration in the assessment of the applications. 

I note your comments about making a paper copy of the application available in the Library, however, owing to restrictions around Covid-19 this will not be possible.

If any residents have any questions they can email the Case Officer at development.management@kingston.gov.uk or write to him at the Guildhall (please mark any email for the attention of Toby Feltham).

Any representations on the applications should be made through the Council's website, by email to development.management@kingston.gov.uk, or in writing.

Regards

Barry John Lomax
Picture

Service Three

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam.
Learn More
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.