Kingston Residents' Alliance
We are active on social media:
  • News Blog
  • Context
    • The story so far
    • Before the final vote
    • KRA Snap Survey Findings
    • Create Streets Guide for Councillors
    • Planning documents >
      • EQDB Deputation by KRA
    • Kingston's Democracy >
      • Neighbourhood Forums
      • GROVEN >
        • Letter to Viv Evans
        • Grove Ward Neighbourhood Invite
      • North Kingston Neighbourhood Forum
      • Meeting Notes
    • RBK Councillors >
      • Who is driving development?
    • Kingston Futures
  • Concerns
    • New Local Plan >
      • Direction of Travel Consultation
      • Opportunity Area
    • Eden Walk >
      • Eden Walk - submission in pictures
      • Eden Walk presentation 18 May
      • Eden Walk presentation 8 March
      • Eden Walk CONCERNS
      • Historic Englands Eden Walk response
      • Design Panel Review
      • Officers report - Eden Walk
    • Canbury Business Park
    • Old Post Office >
      • KRA response 5
      • TOPO - submission in pictures
      • Presentation notes 4
      • Old Post Office v4 Concerns
      • Historic England response v4
      • Q.C. OPINION
      • Our response to the Officers report >
        • Officers report
      • Zac Goldsmiths Response
      • Presentation notes 3
      • KRA response 3
      • A fresh look
      • Why it is wrong
      • Residents opposition
      • Notable opposition
      • What could be acceptable
      • Why some say yes
      • Who will decide
      • Other planning cases
    • Riverside Boardway
    • Market House >
      • Open Letter
      • April 2016 - Update
    • Fairfield
    • Archive >
      • Archive - Old Post Office #3
      • Archive - Old Post Office #2 >
        • Our response to Officers report >
          • Officers report
        • Historic England rejection
        • Why it is wrong
        • Weight of opposition >
          • Letters to Councillors >
            • Letter to Councillors 1
            • Letter to Councillors 2
            • Letter to Councillors 3
          • Speaker Notes >
            • Key Objections Introduction
            • Affordable Housing
            • Heritage
            • Urban design
            • Aesthetic Design
            • What might be acceptable
  • Press
    • In the Press
    • Letters
  • About
    • Our advisers
  • Contact

Fundraising Call

We need a second opinion


We strongly disagree with the 
Planning Officers report and recommendation published on Monday 15th.
It disregards the points we have being saying all along, and it dismisses the Historic England recommendation to REFUSE.

Guideline breech after guideline breech after guideline breech. 
These cannot be dismissed.


We are fighting back!
We need a second opinion.
We are seeking legal advice.

Please help us fund this by donating here:  



Donate


Help us raise the funds to fight this on all fronts.
In conjunction with the Kingston Society charity: all money raised will go though the their account.

Thank you for your support.


See you at the Decision Meeting, Guildhall, 7pm 23rd June 2015.
Powered by
✕